Monday, 26 August 2013

Assignment Four: Real or Fake.

Assignment Four: Real or Fake.

The task I gave myself was to produce an attractive picture for an article promoting Deal as a tourist destination.  
Middle Street is the centre of the conservation area and much loved by residence and tourists alike, so that seemed like a good start.  
The first image is as taken.  I took it at 1/3 stop under so as to save some sky colour and prevent clipping on the lighter buildings.  It was, as you can see, rubbish collection day and the street is full of purple bin bags and one door has a wheelie bin parked in front of it.   Another problem was my reflection which appears in the window on the right. 
Had this been a real photo assignment I would have called a day and returned when the street was tidier but I wanted to see how far I could take this image.


This image is quite clearly unacceptable.  The first change was to increase the exposure and check the white balance.  The next was to increase black, brightness and saturation. I also cropped it slightly to take away some the dark mass of the building on the right.   


The first alterations to the truth of the image were to remove my reflection, the bin bags and wheelie bin and air brush away the yellow no waiting lines.  I can easily justify the removal of the bin and bags as they are not permanent features of the street.  My reflection is also a temporary aberration that can removed with changing the honesty of the image.  The yellow lines however are part of modern life and their exclusion is a lie.  The street looks better without them but is it telling a lie to remove them.  Were I to be using such a picture in a tourist guide I would remove the yellow lines.


Having gone this far what else can be done to give Middle Street an air of an earlier period?  What I did was to remove all the obvious signs of change.  Away went the one tv aerial, off went the modern chimney pots, and down came any outside wiring.  Now this is becoming a lie as these are real features in this street.  This I would say is reaching the unacceptable edge of what is true.


My next move puts a bit of truth back into the altered image as it clearly does not show Middle Street as it is today but attempts to show it as it may have looked at an earlier time.  I did this by adding a sepia tone and a little grain, giving it the feel of an Edwardian photograph.  This last alteration gives the other changes a purpose and the final image some authenticity.  It does not claim to be an early picture but does give a reasonable impression of what Middle Street may have looked like.






Sunday, 25 August 2013

Alteration.

Exercise: Alteration.

The featured picture is one I took out of the front of a car in Sri Lanka last year.  The driving system in Sri Lanka is based on the Buddhist principal that if it is not your turn to die you have nothing to worry about.  That is why our driver, Dillu, was overtaking a bus on a blind bend.  Some sharp braking and steering got us out of the lorry's path.  The image is spoiled by the Budweiser sticker in the window so I have air brushed it out with the clone stamp, dragging in the road surface and shadows from the surrounding area.



Friday, 23 August 2013

Enhancement.

Exercise: Enhancement.

This face is mine and is beyond the help of simple enhancement.  I tried lightening, and I tried darkening I tried selective smoothing and the cloning out of wrinkles and marks but all to no avail.  In the end I gave myself a pair of blue eyes.  I wanted then to look real so I limited the amount of change.  The change hasn't done me any favours in that I think I appear older and meaner.  I certainly look like my long departed grandfather.
I commented on the acceptability of this sort of enhancement in the last entry.  Flattering lighting is one thing, but the enhancing of a face or figure to the extent it is done in advertising is straight forward fraud.   



  

Thursday, 22 August 2013

Improvement or Interpretation.This is

Exercise: Improvement or Interpretation.

I took this is the portrait of a Sri Lankan farmer last year.  The whites of eyes are darkened so that there is little eye definition.  By lightening the whites I have lifted the pupils  and given them the missing detail.



This small change has altered his character completely.  Instead of the soft face of a gentle farmer we now have the staring face of fighter.  This sort of alteration is, to me, not justified.  It may be a believable image but it is far from true.  
To draw an arbitrary line between forgery and flattery is difficult.  The removing of a facial blemish from a bride I would accept, but to airbrush out every wrinkle from the face of a cosmetic model is out and out fraud.  Between these extremes we all draw our own line.